Conservation of Wild Reindeer Population as a Principal
Component of Taimyr's Globally Significant Biodiversity
Project by: Leonid
Baskin
Please note: Mr.
Baskin is interested in getting active support and help for
developing this project from all scientists interested in
this area, region, topics, etc. To contact Mr. Baskin, please
click on his name.
GEF Project Preparation and Development Facility (PDF)
Block A (PDF-A) Grant Proposal for
developing a Medium-size GEF proposal in the Russian
Federations Taimyr Peninsula
PART I Eligibility
- Project Name: Conservation of Wild Reindeer Population
as a Principal Component of Taimyr's Globally Significant
Biodiversity
- GEF Implementing Agency: United Nations Development
Programme (UNDP)
- Country in which the Project will be implemented: Russian
Federation (RF)
- Country Eligibility: Russia ratified the CBD in
May 1995
- GEF Focal Area: Biodiversity
- GEF Operational Program: OP #1 Arid and Semi-Arid
Zone Ecosystems
- Project Linkage to National Priorities, Action Plans,
& Programs:
The project reflects Russias national
priorities in conservation and development. Taimyr is a priority
area for nature conservation and sustainable development in
territories with extremely vulnerable Arctic ecosystems. The
"National Environmental Action Plan" calls for conservation
and sustainable use of biodiversity in the productive landscape
as well as in protected areas.
The RF has actively participated in and engaged
the Program for the Conservation of Arctic Flora and Fauna
(CAFF). CAFF is one of four programs established to implement
the "Arctic Environmental Protection Strategy" adopted in
1991 by eight Arctic countries (Russia, Canada, Denmark, Finland,
Iceland, Norway, Sweden, and the United States). In the absence
of a national biodiversity strategy and action plan for Russia,
CAFF is an important indicator of Russias northern conservation
priorities. In 1997, Russia and her CAFF partners developed
a "Co-operative Strategy for the Conservation of Biological
Diversity in the Arctic Region," patterned largely on relevant
provisions of the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD).
Five objectives emerged from this and were endorsed by the
Arctic Council in 1998 as a framework for future country-based
activities: (1) monitoring of biological diversity; (2) conservation
of genetic resources, species and their habitats; (3) establishment
of protected areas; (4) conservation outside protected areas;
and (5) integration of biodiversity conservation objectives
into economic activities. These objectives reflect Russian
conservation priorities and are inherent in the design of
this medium-size project.
8. GEF national operational focal
point and date of endorsement:
Deputy Chairman Amirkhan Amirkhanov, State
Committee of the Russian Federation for Environmental Protection
(see Annex A for endorsement)
9. Project Rationale and Objectives:
A Description of the Target Area
Any description of the Taimyr Peninsula is
characterized by superlatives. The northern-most area in mainland
Eurasia, the Taimyr is one of the largest block of unbroken
tundra landscape (400,000 km2) in Eurasia. The
Taimyr is home to approximately 1,000,000 wild reindeer -Eurasias
largest population. The Peninsulas vast wetlands serve
as one of the northern-most endpoints for the East Atlantic
Flyway and the Central Asian Flyway, providing crucial nesting
habitat for hundreds of thousands of migratory birds representing
200 species.
Biological diversity is manifested in the
Taimyr in more ways than simply numbers of species. Biodiversity
is also manifested in terms of unique populations and rare
ecological processes. In this northern-most part of Eurasia,
there is still room for the natural manifestation of large-scale
ecological processes. Apart from the migrations of birdlife
into and out of the Peninsula, the most evident of these processes
is the seasonal migration of Eurasias largest population
of wild reindeer as they follow a 1,400 km pathway northwards
in the Spring and southwards in the Fall within the region
itself. Their seasonal presence in different parts of the
peninsula as part of this ancient migratory process has been
revealed by many scientific investigations to be crucial to
maintaining the web of life in the tundra ecosystem, including
habitat heterogeneity, that is responsible for supporting
the peninsulas diversity of life. Consequently, these
wild reindeer are considered by ecologists to be a "keystone"
species in this northern arctic ecosystem and as such their
conservation is crucial to the conservation of greater diverse
web of life.
The severity of the arctic conditions in
the Taimyr has meant that people have not settled here in
large numbers. Most of the human population here live in the
southern most reaches of the peninsula in the city of Norilsk
(approximately 240,000 people), the largest city in the region
and a mining and nickel smelting center in the southernmost
reaches of the Taimyr; in Dudinka, the Okrug capital; and
in a chain of towns situated along a highway and railway connecting
Dudinka and Norilsk (it is in this area where the pipelines
and other industrial communications are concentrated). The
Taimyr has been home to indigenous peoples for many hundreds
of years and is currently home to four groups: the Dolgans
(5226 persons), the Nganasans (873 persons), the Nenetses
(2679 persons), and the Enetses (143 persons).
Past and Current Baseline Activities
Russia has an extensive Federal legislation
relevant to biodiversity conservation and management in the
Arctic. Interdepartmental committees operate to deal with
biodiversity, indigenous peoples interests and other
large northern conservation issues. However, they are currently
ineffective due to current government budgetary constraints
and due to lack of enforcement capability.
Because of increased autonomy and financial
independence of the Regions, local conservation activities,
including the establishment of regional protected areas, have
become increasingly important in recent years. Consultative
planning and management mechanisms for biodiversity conservation
between the federal government, regional and indigenous authorities,
non-governmental organisations and other stakeholders will
need considerable strengthening if they are to be effective
in developing a holistic approach to nature conservation in
the Russian Arctic. For its biodiversity conservation efforts,
Russia has relied heavily on the establishment of zapovedniks,
national parks and other types of protected areas.
Peninsula as a whole:
Russia has long recognized the unique importance
of the Taimyr Peninsulas biological diversity. This
has been supported by the establishment of three state reserves
(zapovedniks), one federal and several regional nature protected
areas (game reserves) within the Taimyr Autonomous Okrug.
In recent years Russias largest protected area, the
Great Arctic Reserve (4,200,000 ha), the Arctic section of
Taimyr Reserve (350,000 ha) and the Severnaya Zemlya Federal
Game Reserve (420,000 ha) were established there. The area
of protected territories account for about 13% of the total
land area in the Taimyr Autonomous Okrug. The development
of new protected areas is still in progress, and within the
WWF campaign "Living Planet" the Taimyr Governor G.P.Nedelin
has promised to increase the share of protected territories
up to 20% of the total area. In previous times, conservation
work was very much science-oriented and intensive management
oriented. Large scientific studies were carried out and even
larger government-funded programs were implemented to try
and maintain some kind of "balance" in Taimyrs ecosystem.
Clearly, the conservation paradigm in the Taimyr is shifting
from an expensive, centralized, government-supported effort
to "control" nature to a paradigm that emphasizes natures
preeminent role in managing herself and seeks to conserve
the natural ecological processes that sustain biodiversity
in the Peninsula.
At the same time, the economic paradigm is
shifting in the Taimyr. The peninsula is struggling to develop
a new market-based economy in the aftermath of the collapsed,
state-supported economy from the Soviet period. The peninsulas
few rural communities are comprised of indigenous people.
These communities still seek alternative means of making a
living after the rapid disappearance of Soviet-era domestic
reindeer herding and other activities. The southern-most area
of the Taimyr Peninsula is home to one of the worlds
largest nickel production facilities. An agreement has been
signed among the Government of Russia, the Taimyr Okrug, and
the Shell Oil Company to begin oil exploration activities
in the western edge of the Region.
In past Soviet times, indigenous peoples
were stripped of their traditional livelihoods and forced
to work in cooperative state-run reindeer farming and other
enterprises. This has led to an unfortunate situation now
where indigenous peoples find themselves in a sort of cultural
and economic limbo, having been stripped of their traditional
livelihoods and forcibly integrated into a social/economic
system that no longer exists. The most realistic and desirable
route expressed by indigenous leaders is for their people
to return to their traditional way of life in the modern context
of the 21st century, similar to how arctic peoples
are living in North America. This must happen soon, while
their collective memory of their traditional way of life is
still carried by their elders. In this traditional value system,
the well-being and traditional lifestyles can be improved
only as part of a more enlightened conservation and sustainable
management approach to the Taimyrs natural ecosystems.
Specific project area:
Nearly 862,000 km2 in size, the
Taimyr Autonomous Okrug is enormous. The medium-size GEF project
to be developed under this Block A grant will focus on the
central migratory corridor of the peninsula only (see map
in Annex B). The corridor area contains a representation of
some of Taimyrs best dry and forest tundra plant communities
as well as wildlife habitat. The corridor area where the project
proposes to work stretches from wintering grounds for the
reindeer in the south around the Putorana Nature Reserve,
northwards to the middle of the peninsula in the Taimyrskii
Nature Reserve and key calving grounds in this area, and finally
to the summer feeding grounds on northern coast of the peninsula,
including parts of the Bolshoy Arcticheskii Zapovednik
(Great Arctic Nature Reserve). The area has been chosen because
of its importance not only wild reindeer migration, but also
because it represents a strategic and characteristic cross-section
of the various plant and animal communities that comprise
the greater Taimyr arctic ecosystem for which reindeer are
considered to be the keystone species.
There are only three small communities in
the project area with a total population of 1,760 people,
including members of the Nganasans and Dolgans indigenous
groups. Most of these people live from hunting, trapping,
fishing and some reindeer herding. The Soviet domestic reindeer
breeding industry no longer exists. Other economic activities
like collection of berries, eggs, and handicrafts are also
of some importance. Currently, these people are not involved
in any kind of cooperative effort with the protected areas
to research and monitor wildlife and ecological conditions,
or to management. Most of them live on social benefits.
These three protected areas, like most in
Russia are staffed with some qualified, dedicated professionals
who are experiencing very difficult times as a result of drastically
reduced Government support. As a result, these protected areas
are trying to understand how they can best evolve from their
former management approach, one that was inward looking, theoretical
and exclusive of local communities, to a new management approach
that re-defines their mission, their methods and their relationship
with the human communities and natural landscapes around them.
In addition, the existing protected area
system is not aligned or managed to support a landscape-level
biodiversity conservation and management regime. The three
PAs are not managed in a way that emphasizes their important
role in helping to maintain the ability of reindeer to migrate
freely across the Taimyr landscape. They are not part of an
overall landscape management framework designed to conserve
the migratory process over the long term. They do not coordinate
their management actions among themselves, nor is there any
kind of cooperative monitoring program. Local communities
(especially indigenous groups) are not included in any kind
of co-management arrangement in these areas. And in fact,
the SPAs staff members are under-funded and under-trained
in this respect, lacking the requisite skills and perspectives
to be able to successfully work with local people in developing
and implementing a landscape management plan for tundra grassland
conservation. Indeed, in Russia to date, world experience
and lessons learned in managing landscapes for significant
populations of species and ecological processes, as well as
for the sustainable livelihood of indigenous groups and local
communities, has been used insufficiently.
Linkages with Other GEF Initiatives
UNEP GRID Arendal is developing a
GEF project that addresses ecosystem fragmentation issues
in the whole of the Russian Arctic. The project, titled Integrated
Ecosystem Approach to Conserve Biodiversity and Minimise Habitat
Fragmentation in the Russian Arctic, is in the PDF B phase.
UNDP and UNEP are working closely together to ensure that
the two initiatives, the UNDP MSP and the future UNEP
GRID Arctic wide, full project, complement and support each
other.
Current threats to Biodiversity
Even though the Taimyr system is not being
degraded currently, the area is nevertheless under a number
of threats. These are:
- Landscape fragmentation and habitat destruction caused
by roads, surface pipelines, and mining activities. Oil
and gas development activities are especially intense in
the western area of the Taimyr. For most of the peninsula,
this is more of a potential threat then a clear and present
threat.
- The prospect of unsustainable and inappropriate exploitation
of the peninsulas natural resources;
- Organized poaching (marginal, but persistent);
Root causes:
- Lack of a landscape-scale biodiversity conservation framework
to ensure conservation of important reindeer calving grounds
and migratory pathways, and key bird nesting and molting
refuges;
- Lack of traditional livelihood options for indigenous
people;
- Insufficient legislation and policy framework at the Okrug
level;
- Inadequate local advocacy and support for the biodiversity
of the Taimyr;
- Lack of traditional livelihood knowledge among indigenous
youth;
- Lack of sufficient coordination among the protected areas,
regional authorities, and private sector.
Rationale:
The most serious threats to biodiversity
in the Taimyr are imminent future threats rather than existing
ones. But if nothing is done to prevent and/or mitigate activities
like inappropriate mining and oil/road development, they will
ultimately threaten to fragment the landscape and destroy
habitat across the entire peninsula both directly and indirectly
by disrupting the keystone importance of wild reindeer migration
. This situation calls for a preventative intervention to
demonstrate how the Taimyr can maintain its unique biodiversity
and landscape-scale ecological processes (reindeer and bird
migrations).
Recognizing this need to balance conservation
of the globally significant biodiversity with the sustainable
development of the peninsulas small human population,
the Governor of the Autonomous Taimyr Okrug has pledged to
increase to 20% that portion of the peninsula that is protected.
This is a laudable and commendable goal, but what is currently
lacking is a land and biodiversity management regime that
(1) sufficiently involves local stakeholders & (2) is
appropriate to the landscape scale ecological process of migrating
reindeer.
10. A Description of Project Objective/Expected
Outcomes (Purpose)/Activities to Achieve
Overall Objective:
The long-term objective of the project is
to ensure the sustainable conservation of biodiversity of
global significance in the Taimyr Peninsula.
Expected Outcomes-- Project Purpose:
What change will the project have brought about?
By the end of the project, stakeholders will
have expanded the conservation paradigm in the Taimyr from
one being "protected area-centric" to a more integrated landscape
approach involving protected areas and the productive landscape.
More specifically:
- Stakeholders will be implementing a sustainable conservation
and management regime for the central reindeer migratory
corridor of the Taimyr Peninsula.
- Strengthened protected area management: The three protected
areas will be managed in cooperation with local communities
and in collaboration with each other on conserving the
reindeer migratory processes so important to biodiversity
in Taimyr.
- Indigenous people will be rehabilitating and maintaining
their traditional activities;
- Landscape-level biodiversity conservation/land-use framework
for the reindeer migratory corridor agreed upon by all
stakeholders and adopted by the Okrug Administration;
- Effective targeted research and monitoring program to
measure key indicators of ecosystem structure and function,
including reindeer migration dynamics;
- A sustainable, low-input cooperative management regime
for the migratory corridor comprised of Okrug officials,
PA officials, academicians, indigenous peoples, NGOs,
and other local resource users to sustainably conserve
the biological diversity of the peninsula;
- Indigenous peoples will be actively maintaining their
knowledge, innovation, and practices relevant to biodiversity
conservation and will revive their traditional livelihoods
in cooperation with a new co-management program with professional
biodiversity managers.
- Increased technical capacity of local authorities and
staff in charge of the reserve
- A strengthened legislative and economic framework in
place providing local incentives for biodiversity conservation
and sustainable resource use;
- A sustainable funding mechanism for conservation in
Taimyr supported by mineral and oil revenues generated
in Taimyr area.
- Increased local awareness on biodiversity protection;
Planned Activities to Achieve Outcomes:
- Capacity building for protected area management: fine-tune
and implement innovative management plan for the Pas that
makes more allowance for the seasonal migration of reindeer
and other animals;
- Conduct a modest targeted research and monitoring program
to identify priority habitats and measure key indicators
of ecosystem structure and function, and define the baseline
biodiversity situation.
- Integrating biodiversity conservation and sustainable
use objectives in land-use and natural resource-use management
plans in relation to the reindeer herd;
- Develop an open, participatory management process in partnership
with local stakeholders;
- Update and implement environmental education programs
for key stakeholders in the Okrug;
- Enable indigenous people to actively maintain their knowledge,
innovation, and practices relevant to biodiversity conservation,
including sustainable use of reindeer;
- Reform the existing legal framework so as to support updated
biodiversity conservation and development activities;
- Develop effective cooperative program with specially managed
Arctic ecosystems in other parts of Eurasia and North America;
- Enable local stakeholders to develop alternative livelihoods.
Introduce new conceptual and technological tools for conservation-based
development in the Peninsula;
- Develop sustainable funding mechanism for conservation
of the Taimyr ecosystem.
11. Stakeholders Involved in the Project:
Government Units
- Autonomous Okrug Government
- State Committee for Northern Territories,
- The State Committee for Environmental Protection
- Taimyr Regional Department of the State Committee for
Environmental Protection,
- The Regional Land Committee
- Arctic Agriculture Research Institute,
- Moscow State University
- Institute for Ecology and Evolution of Russian Academy
of Sciences.
Private sector
- Local small business focusing on environmental practices
- Association of Indigenous Minorities of Taimyr
- All-Russia Reindeer Herders Union
- Private sector (Shell Oil, Norilsk Nickel Co. And Norilsk
Gasprom Co.)
Local communities
- Local and regional communities
- Taimyr Branch of the Russian Association of Indigenous
Peoples of the North.
- Norilsk Ecological Fund
- Indigenous groups
- Professional communities and associations (teachers, scientists)
Part II Information on PDF Activities
12-13. Expected Outputs and Completion
Dates/Activities to be Financed by the PDF:
See Annex D for a more specific workplan.
The following is a summary:
- preparatory consultations with national and regional administration
and local stakeholders in the Peninsula (June 2000)
- Block A consultation/agreement on priority components
of Medium size proposal/preliminary analysis of Incremental
Cost (IC) Analysis (July 2000)
- Draft Medium-size proposal submitted for approval by GEF
in October 2000.
Activity 1: Assessment and analysis
of existing information
Scientific data and baseline information
currently exists for the region. The project team will compile
and consolidate this information.
The following are types of existing information
to be included in the analysis:
- Studies and reports on flora and fauna
- Vegetation and habitat maps of the area (satellite images,
political, topographic, etc.)
- Studies and reports on PA (management plans, development
plans, etc.)
- Assessment of quality and relevance of existing maps/studies/reports
and scientific data
Deliverable: Analysis of existing
scientific data on project site for use in project development.
Activity 2: Socio-economic surveys
in the project site and stakeholder consultations
Conduct stakeholder/issues analysis and
consultations with stakeholders at the national, Okrug and
local level. These meetings will be organized by the Block
A Director and will be conducted during the first two months
of the project. The purpose of these meetings is to provide
stakeholders with an opportunity to provide input into the
project development process.
Information should be gathered on the outstanding
issues associated with each specific area:
- Threats to biodiversity and their root causes in the project
site area;
- Problems encountered in management of biodiversity conservation
areas;
- Possible solutions to these root causes and problems including
awareness programs and institutional capacity building;
- Future development needs and options for sustainable alternative
livelihoods;
- Determination of socio-economic and cultural impacts of
current land use.
This stakeholder consultation will be supported
by site-based biological and socio-economic surveys, which
will serve to complement data on biodiversity and threats,
and complete a social assessment for each area. The social
assessment will project site result in identification of:
- Description of all major stakeholder issues
- Assessment of management framework in the priority area.
What are the gaps & the needs?
- Assessment of socio-economic context (population, economy,
culture, opportunities/constraints).
- Assessment of tribes, families, persons in terms of relations
to use of natural resources; evaluation of readiness to
participate in the Medium size Project;
- Assessment of the legal framework for biodiversity conservation
- Assessment of existing awareness and education baseline
and how to encourage stakeholders to support biodiversity
conservation.
Deliverables: Information needed
to formulate activities/outputs for the medium-size project.
Activity 3: Analyze how best
to establish the multi-sectoral partnerships
needed to manage productive landscape corridor areas for
biodiversity values.
- Develop recommendations for a land-use management framework
in the corridor area (development of land use regulations
taking in account interests of indigenous peoples
Deliverables: Complete analysis
with maps and suggested approaches in each LC.
Activity 4: GEF Project Formulation
A full proposal for GEF funding will be
prepared, based on the results of Activities 1-3. The medium
size project brief will be presented to the GEF Secretariat
for approval. Recommendations made by, GEF Sec, will be
addressed. Finally, the Brief will be converted into a UNDP
project document, with detailed Terms of Reference for technical
inputs, an inputs budget, work plan, details of risks and
mitigation measures and other information, as per standard
UNDP requirements.
The process of preparing the medium-size
project brief will require:
- An IC analysis to differentiate between baseline and incremental
activities. PDF funds will be used to collect information
on the baseline scenario, identify and cost incremental
activities to conserve the wild reindeer population as the
principle component of biodiversity, and develop complementary
baseline and incremental activities.
- Confirmation of co-financing for project components not
eligible for GEF funding.
Deliverables: 1) Co-financing
for the sustainable development; 2) A consensus regarding
the project strategy; 3) The main body of the Brief will
clearly present the following information:
- A summary of the global significance and unique biological
and ecological attributes of the project site and the global
benefits that would accrue from conservation intervention.
- Details of the biological, ecological, social and economic
attributes of the sites
- A description of the threats to biodiversity and their
root causes; and strategy for mitigating them.
- An description and quantification of the realistic baseline
- Identification of the sustainable development baseline
(comprising additional activities required to address threats
that may be justified in the domestic interest)
- Identification and justification of the incremental costs
of activities needed to generate global conservation benefits,
over and above the sustainable development baseline.
- Details of monitoring and evaluation measures
- Details of execution and implementation measures, with
an accompanying organogram
The following annexes will be attached
to the Brief:
- IC assessment describing global and domestic benefits,
and justifying IC for each output
- Logical Framework Assessment, with quantifiable indicators
to measure impact, a list of sources of verification, and
an outline of the assumptions and risks that underpin the
project
- Details of the biodiversity values of the project site,
to supplement information in the Brief itself
- Assessment of the risks affecting project implementation
and outline of mitigation measures
- Summary of the Stakeholder Assessment and Social Feasibility
Study, defining the roles and responsibilities of different
groups in design, implementation, monitoring and evaluation
- Map of the project area
- List of reference materials
Activity 5: Development of Monitoring
and Evaluation Plan:
Impact and output indicators will be selected
and baseline data obtained as a basis for measuring project
outcomes. An M&E Plan will be developed, clearly articulating
monitoring objectives and specifying monitoring and evaluation
activities.
- Complete a plan of monitoring the reindeer population,
concentrations of nesting and molting birds, denning places
of wolf, arctic fox and bear with assistance of indigenous
people (how to arrange monitoring points with a complex
of living and communication facilities, moving groups of
observers);
Deliverables: M&E Plan, with
clear performance indicators
14. Possible Funding Partners for MSP
& Amount:
UNDP Moscow: to be determined
State Committee: $100,000
Bilateral Donors: (estimated) $250,000
Currently involved in discussions with
the following potential partners:
- Department of Indian and Northern Affairs
- Canadian Parliamentary Centre
- Netherlands
- Finland
- Germany
Private Sector:
Part III Information on the
Applicant Institution(s)
16. Name:
The "Arctic Ring" Foundation (ARF) has submitted
this project with the support of WWF Russia.
17. Date of Establishment, Membership,
and Leadership:
ARF was established in March 1996. The organization
is managed by a Director, currently Mr. Maxim Sinitsyn. Some
of the members of ARF include the State Committee for the
North, the Administration of Taimyr Autonomous Region, the
Administration of Dickson, and approximately 10 private individuals.
ARF is currently managing four biodiversity initiatives. Among
other things, ARF established the Red Cross branch in Taimyr,
organized and managed humanitarian support from the Netherlands
for Dickson, provided Taimyr with access to NTV (one of Russias
TV networks), and continues to organize support for Puturansky
and the Great Arctic Reserve.
Membership: Institutions and private
individuals
Leadership: Director: Dr. Maxim G.
Sinitsyn
WWF as an international non-governmental
environmental charity was officially established in 1961.
WWF Russian Programme Office (WWF RPO) was opened in 1994.
However, WWFs active involvement in Russia started in
late 80s with primarily projects in the Russian Arctic. Now
WWF RPO runs about 80 projects in various region of the Russian
Federation with the annual budget of about 6,000,000 USD.
WWF RPO is supervised by the Russian Country Team, which currently
serves as a Board and consists of members of major WWF National
Organizations involved with the Russian Programme. WWF RPO
is governed by the Director, currently Mr. Igor Chestin. Apart
from the head office in Moscow WWF Russian Programme has offices
in Vladivostok, Syktyvkar, Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky, Ufa,
Abakan and Pskov.
18. Mandate/Terms of Reference:
ARF is a national nature conservation NGO
with offices in Moscow and Dudinka (Taimyr Autonomous Okrug).
ARFs mandate is the protection of specific nature territories
and water area in Russian Arctic; the protection of rare Arctic
species; the protection of Arctic cultural heritage; sustainable
development in the Arctic. The Governor of Taimyr Autonomous
Okrug entrusts ARF with the observing of nature conservation
projects in the region.
WWF is the largest international wildlife
conservation NGO, with 26 national programs and over 5 million
individual supporters world-wide. In the Russian Federation,
WWFs mandate is the protection of rare species, strengthening
of protected areas, and sustainable resource use.
19. Sources of Revenue:
Both organizations are supported by private
contributions, bilateral funds, and by international environmental
organizations and donor supported aid programs.
20. Recent Activities/Programs in Particular
those Relevant to the GEF:
ARF:
- Taimyrs involvement into "The Living Planet" WWF
campaign;
- "Brekhovskiye Ostrova" (Brekhovski Isiands in the Enisseys
mouth) State Nature Reserve Project;
- Putoranski State Nature Reserves nomination into
the World Heritage List;
- Taimyr Conservation Legislation Project.
WWF:
1. Baltic Sea Regional Project. WWF
participates and contributes its own resources to this GEF
sponsored project.
2. Establishment of the Protected Areas
Systems in the Russian Arctic (supported by the Ministry
of Agriculture, Nature Management and Fisheries of the Netherlands).
PART IV Information on Implementing
Agency
22. Implementing Agency Contact Person
Peter Newton, Environment Unit and UNDP/GEF
Program Coordinator, UNDP Office, Moscow
(7095) 787-2102(Phone); (7095) 787-2100 (Fax)
Dr Christopher Briggs, RBEC/GEF Regional
Coordinator (New York).
(212) 906-6402 (Phone); (212) 906-5102
(Fax)
23. Project Linkage to Implementing Agency
Programs
This project follows UNDP-Russias Country
Cooperation Framework (CCF) prepared jointly by UNDP and the
Government for the period 1997-2001. The CCF states conservation
and sustainable use of environmental resources as one of its
main priorities. . UNDP Russia targets regions of the Russian
Federation that are experiencing the most difficulty during
the transition process. This includes many of the Northern
and Far East regions of the Federation.
ANNEX D: Workplan for the PDF-A phase of the GEF project
|
Activity/month
|
Output
|
Responsible
|
Months
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
|
Finalize details of Workplan for PDF-A
|
Define workplan detail
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Select team of experts
|
Working group for PDF-A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Activity 1: Assessment and analysis
of existing information
|
Assessments for use in developing
project brief
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assess existing information on biodiversity
(including migratory movements, etc) in the central
corridor area.
|
Biodiversity and land management baseline
data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consult with Federal Departments on
Environment, Energy and in Research Institutes of Russian
Academy of Sciences.
|
Information on existing programs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gather and assess information on the
socio-economic situation in the local communities during
the last 3 years.
|
Socio-economic baseline data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assessment of existing laws and policies;
analysis of how to improve this existing system w/respect
to the projects overall purpose -- conservation
of biodiversity at the landscape level.
|
Written assessment and analysis.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Activity 2: Field surveys in
the project site and stakeholder consultations
|
Information from the field; Agreements
w/key local stakeholder groups.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Develop program w/local stakeholders
for their involvement in the projects planning
and implementation
|
A public participation program
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assess alternative livelihood possibilities
and how the project can enable indigenous communities
to preserve and maintain their traditional knowledge.
|
Specific programmatic recommendations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finding co-financing and matching funds
for MSP
|
Co-funding agreements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Activity/month
|
Output
|
Responsible
|
Months
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
|
Assess existing protected area management
capacity
|
Assessment of capacity and recommendations
of what the project can do to strengthen.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Develop appropriate and innovative
stakeholder education and awareness raising program.
|
A set of public awareness and technical
capacity programs developed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Activity 3: Analyze how best to
establish the multi-sectoral partnerships needed
to manage productive landscape corridor areas for biodiversity
values.
|
Written recommendations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimate cost-effective alternatives
for a monitoring system, including the development of
a GIS.
|
A biodiversity and land management
monitoring system
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Activity 4: GEF Project Formulation
A full proposal for GEF funding will
be prepared, based on the results of Activities 1-3.
|
1) Co-financing for the sustainable
development; 2) A consensus regarding the project strategy;
3) Project brief clearly presents the required information.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Development of logical framework for
project
|
Identification of threats, potential
actions, and project scope.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preparation of draft Project Brief
and review by stakeholders.
|
Comments on MSP draft incorporated
in final version
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Circulate medium size project brief
to STAP for review. Address comments made by STAP, GEF,
UNEP, WB.
|
MSP ready to be presented to the GEF
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Brief will be converted into a
UNDP project document, with detailed Terms of Reference,
a detailed budget, work plan, details of risks and mitigation
measures, per standard UNDP requirements.
|
Project Document ready to be signed
by Govt of Russia and UNDP.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|